The two concepts should not cover the operations undertaken

Instead of the designation of automated and autonomous greenhouse, the actual decision-making task should be considered. In automation, intervention may be performed according to predefined settings and rules. The decisions and adaptive operations of the solutions referred to as autonomy can also be taken by data. However, the specific ability is always determined by the description of the chosen system. The investor should not refer to the production result from the technological label. M Hoogendoorn algorithms and Van der Hoeven integrated greenhouse approach is a professional starting point. In the own project, it must be recorded which decision the system is making and where human responsibility remains.

Specific level of decision of the cultivation strategy

Automatic operation of equipment and determination of the production target are different tasks. The plant, the production period and the limitations undertaken by the operator also provide the technology with initial data. The supplier of the system shall be clarified which objective may be modified, who is entitled to do so and what effect the interface shows. The customer must ask for a presentation that separates strategic adjustment and daily intervention. If both have the same generic automatic operation designation, the liability limit is not clear enough. The usefulness of the investment will be facilitated if the local growing team understands this difference.

Without data and intervention there is no local capability

An advanced algorithm may operate only in the context of the data available to it and the associated equipment. The task of the intended sensors, data links and interveners should therefore be tested together with the system. The different design of the local building may mean a different capacity and limitations than a model example of a manufacturer. In addition to the equipment list, the technical offer shall include the limit of integration. From which system point is verified data and what feedback confirms the intervention? The customer can thus distinguish between the function actually provided and the possibility available in a later development before building the operating plan on it.

In a flawed and new situation, you need a human way

The unknown or uncertain state shall be treated separately in the operating order. In consultation with the experts of the system, what happens in the event of missing data, plant failure or significant change in the production programme. The operator knows where the decision is being made and when to request professional support. The limit of manual override and automatic return shall also be understood. The AI the name does not replace this organisation. The actual content of the undertaking is shown by the local system test and documentation, not by a claim of general technological development or by a result for another plant.

The decision history should remain verifiable

For the purpose of assessing the operation, the adjustment used, the data used and the relationship of the operation performed are useful. Therefore, the issue of logging and access should be clarified when purchasing the system. The local production results should be analysed together with their own data and the known operation. A successful technical test will provide evidence of the function transferred, but will not establish subsequent production performance. Thus, the difference between automation and autonomous operation for the investor becomes a specific question that can be understood in terms of contract and operation. Instead of the name of the system, the task, the evidence, and the responsible will be the priority.

Questions to reconcile the project

  • Which strategic and daily decision does the system actually make?
  • What sensors and interveners are required for the power transmitted?
  • Who, and in what situation, can override the operation and what remains in the log?

Professional background

The related international system solutions are provided by these primary manufacturers and execution sites. The decision aspects of the project shall be interpreted independently by the article; the specific size and content of the undertaking shall be clarified on the basis of the investment data.

Alabama Szer Kft.

development project preparation

The structure, engineering and on-site installation of the greenhouse is a coordinated working process. Learn the service area and compare the tasks of the planned investment.