In addition to size, use is described

A greenhouse interest often begins with a territory and a desired date. These are important data, but they're not telling us what facility to prepare. The planned crop, the production period and the daily working process may create different needs. The purpose of the first consultation is therefore to clarify the functioning of the built environment of the investor.

It is worth describing separately what is safe and what is only an idea. The selected plot may be factual data, while the cultivation method is still awaiting comparison. The combination of the two may later mislead an election. A short, improved project data sheet is more useful than a long machine list, some of which no one knows what problems they need to solve.

We need evidence of the crime scene.

In addition to the address of the site, the available drawings, surveys and public works data will help you talk. A specific question is the transport approach, the water path and the place of subsequent enlargement. You don't have to make a plan out of these right away. The first thing to recognize is the ability to limit the concept and the additional on-site or service information required.

A statement that there is water or electricity nearby is not enough for operational conditions. The investor may provide documents of existing connections and the technical team may indicate the needs to be examined. This gives a clear division of tasks: verification of the capacity actually available and determination of the need for a new system are two separate steps, not one oral assumption.

Split up the building and technology

Greenhouse structure, climate, irrigation and production start-up are linked but not automatically the same business circle. We need to indicate already in contact that we are looking for a complete project, a part-task or an existing design execution. Thus, participants in the discussion know which issues require the involvement of another branch or cultivation specialist and where the transfer point should be fixed.

For example, in a request for structural construction, the status of the supplier's type plan and on-site connections may be decisive. A whole new investment requires first clarification of the concept and the order of responsibility. The two situations have different preparations. The description of the commitment limit does not prevent cooperation; it shows exactly what task still needs to be coordinated.

Next step at the end of the discussion

The result of a good first conversation is not necessarily a final price. It could be a crime scene assignment list, a missing utility data, a cohesive crop decision or a necessary crop. Every point is worth ordering responsible. The next meeting will move forward if it brings new data and does not repeat the same assumptions in other words.

The investor may carry with him a summary of the purpose, the characteristics known, the parts in question and the following investigation. This will then also help to interpret offers. If there is a change in the purpose of cultivation or location, the data sheet shall be updated. An estimate resulting from a previous discussion will remain only in accordance with the conditions at the time, not as an independent final offer.

Questions to reconcile the project

  • Which cultivation data are you sure about?
  • What on-site document is available?
  • To what task do we ask for an execution offer?

Professional background

The related international system solutions are provided by these primary manufacturers and execution sites. The decision aspects of the project shall be interpreted independently by the article; the specific size and content of the undertaking shall be clarified on the basis of the investment data.

Alabama Szer Kft.

development project preparation

The structure, engineering and on-site installation of the greenhouse is a coordinated working process. Learn the service area and compare the tasks of the planned investment.